I’ve mentioned a couple times that my main source of cheap pine is off-cuts from tongue-and-groove pine siding. I’m running a bit low, but I’ve managed to make a three-foot tall stack of 36″ to 48″ long boards last for most of a year. While the material is fluffy and easy to work, it isn’t exactly stable, and most of the time, is significantly twisted and cupped (thankfully, not often bowed). This presents an obvious problem: final board thickness.
Before preparation, any given piece is only about 11/16″ thick, and the “raw” board can have almost 1/8″ of cup/twist or more. This means that after flattening and straightening to S2S, I’m often a barely a shade over 1/2″ on some parts of the board. Passing the piece goes through the thicknesser takes it down to a hair over 1/2″ all around at S4S.
This is why I’ve gotten in the habit of only S3S’ing these boards when the project can allow for it. For example, the bottom shelf of the toy workbench was made of four such boards. The underside of that shelf will never be visible, so I left the extra mass in the boards by only S3S’ing them.
I also use this trick when I need an inside tenon shoulder or when a board is too wide for my thicknesser, in each case where the inside face will otherwise be concealable.
This trick isn’t available in some applications, however. For instance, I can’t attach drawer runners to the twisted inside face of a side rail (like for the angled leg side table) and the underside of a tabletop should be trued to mate well to the table frame. I guess you could technically use rabbets to solve each problem, but that seems like even more work than just thicknessing properly.
I haven’t disassembled much antique furniture, but I find it difficult to believe I’m the first person to cut this corner when possible. I think this shortcut thing is becoming a running theme.
It is (or was) very common to see insides of cabinets and such to be almost unfinished. Before machines took over, the smoothing plane never touched the insides of the case or the bottoms of drawers, for example. You can still find the scalloped surfaces left by the scrub plane on the bottoms of tables. Even 20th century books on building cabinets say not to sand the inside or unseen parts with the same attention given to visible surfaces.
Do not let this bother you. It is evidence that the piece is indeed handmade, something the average person considers something like magic. Any woodworker or furniture maker who condemns this is an elitist.
I admire what I’ve seen on this blog, and I think you should be proud. Carry on…
Thank you! I greatly appreciate the kind words.
I’m sure the practiced evolved out of an efficient sensibility and I’m happy to carry it on.
By the way, I thought of this blog while reading: https://thefurniturerecord.wordpress.com/about/
And here’s his Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bradfordwoodworking
Careful – You might lose a few hours there!
LikeLiked by 1 person
And almost as if he was reading our minds, an example from no less than Christopher Schwarz: